(9) basicphilosophical problems, essential to ethics (“philosophy inpractice”) a
ID: 1242730 • Letter: #
Question
(9) basicphilosophical problems, essential to ethics (“philosophy inpractice”) are:
Match the aboveto the related statement below:
a__lack of agreed-upon Objective Standard
b__lack of individual/social moral (even agreed-upon)objectivityprevents clarity of thought
c__ can’t prove one is human dreaming she’s abutterfly…or butterfly, dreaming he’s human
d__if we can’t know chocolate’s taste to another, howknow consciousness beyond our own
e__can’t all one’s experiences, desires, knowledge,circumstances make an action inevitable
f__the existence of not just one, obvious ‘good’motive, but of so many other ‘good’ motives
g__the refusal to happily accept logic telling us to fear only ifwe survive it! (Pascal’s wager)
h__can’t (dis)prove there might be more to the world than canbe understood by physical science
i__symbols, our only links to each other and God, haveno intrinsic meaning in themselves
j__philosophically we can’t disprove that it might not onlybe meaningless, but absurd.
Please it is urgent
Explanation / Answer
Problem of establishing basis of morality - lack of agreed-uponObjective Standard
Problem of when inequalities are unjust - lack ofindividual/social moral (even agreed-upon)objectivity preventsclarity of thought
Problem of the relation between mind and brain - can’tprove one is human dreaming she’s a butterfly…orbutterfly, dreaming he’s human
Problem of minds other than our own - if we can’t knowchocolate’s taste to another, how know consciousness beyondour own
Problem of whether we have free will - can’t allone’s experiences, desires, knowledge, circumstances make anaction inevitable
Problem (most basic) of all morality - the existence of not justone, obvious ‘good’ motive, but of so many other‘good’ motives
Problem of the nature of death - the refusal to happily acceptlogic telling us to fear only if we survive it!(Pascal’s wager)
Problem of knowledge of the world beyond our minds - can’t(dis)prove there might be more to the world than can be understoodby physical science
Problem of how language is possible - symbols, our onlylinks to each other and God, have no intrinsic meaning inthemselves
Problem of the meaning of life - philosophically we can’tdisprove that it might not only be meaningless, but absurd.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.