Suppose that university regulations are proposed requiring all new dorm faciliti
ID: 1220605 • Letter: S
Question
Suppose that university regulations are proposed requiring all new dorm facilities utilize solar energy for water heating. A new dorm facility is being built and two hybrid water heating systems that utilize solar to supplement natural gas heating. Option 1 is based on double glazed flat plate collectors and Option 2 uses evacuated tubular collectors. Both options have a useful life of 20 years. Pertinent data is listed in the table below. Assuming an interest rate of 10%, which option is preferred?
Option 1
Option 2
Capital Cost:
$3,200,000
$2,700,000
Annual Maintenance Cost:
$50,000
$80,000
Anticipated Fuel Savings:
$600,000
$560,000
Option 1
Option 2
Capital Cost:
$3,200,000
$2,700,000
Annual Maintenance Cost:
$50,000
$80,000
Anticipated Fuel Savings:
$600,000
$560,000
Explanation / Answer
Option 1:
Annual net benefit = Fuel savings - Maintenance cost = $(600,000 - 50,000) = $550,000
NPV ($) = - 3,200,000 + 550,000 x PVIFA(10%, 20) = - 3,200,000 + 550,000 x 8.5136 = - 3,200,000 + 4,682,480
= 1,482,480
Option 2:
Annual net benefit = $(560,000 - 80,000) = $480,000
NPV ($) = - 2,700,000 + 480,000 x PVIFA(10%, 20) = - 2,700,000 + 480,000 x 8.5136 = - 2,700,000 + 4,086,528
= 1,386,528
Since Option 1 has higher positive NPV, option 1 should be chosen.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.