Describe a corruption continuum with details how organizations can become corrup

Question

Describe a corruption continuum with details how organizations can become corrupt through actions of its leaders through the following: -administrative indifference - ignoring obvious ethical problems -creating a hyposcrisy and fear-dominated culture -survival-of-the fittest approach by individual employees Using the internet as a resouce identify a current issue that illustrates how a lack of leadership has lead to one or more of these failing and in turn resulted in corruption. Be sure to identiy the source of your material.

Explanation / Answer

Administrative Indifference:

Because of administrators' instantly resentful and defensive behaviors towards promoting and enhacing key ethical value in office create corruption. When workplaces are filled with employees who never have had ethics training, then the vast majority of workers feel occupational stress from rampant backstabbing, internal politics, hidden agendas, and blatant unfairness ..

It is widespread indifference that serves as the breeding ground for future misconduct. Pitfalls in the daily operations of a business that are the most revealing of integrity-related indifference include these indicators:

* A low quality of recruitment and hiring.

* The perception that discipline or promotion is unfair:

* Disgruntlement among field training officers.

* Supervisors who treat people with a lack of respect.

Negligence of Obvious Ethical Problems:

Intentionally ignoring obvious ethical problems primarily arises out of one of two problems: a lack of knowledge or a certain self-centeredness.

Lack of knowledge: misconduct occurs because administrators don't know what they can do to prevent or stop it. This is a circumstance in which leaders have the courage and desire to enhance integrity yet lack the knowledge, skill, or ability to carry out their good intentions. Their lack of training doesn't excuse them from being responsible, but it is the primary reason that misconduct has been able to flourish. They must still hold themselves accountable for ensuring that they learn how to implement and maintain the state of the art in misconduct prevention.

Self-centeredness: The second reason why some leaders don't do more about clear ethical problems is that they believe that bringing attention to their integrity needs could hurt them personally. Encouraged by the hope that they will escape scrutiny and criticism if no one brings attention to the situation, they make their self centeredness more important than maintaining integrity. Examples include doing nothing even though they know that:

* Discrimination or harassment is occurring.

* Sex among employees who are married to other people or with a supervisor exists.

* There is a general lack of accountability: some officers may have a number of citizen complaints or use-of force incidents, for example.

* Some supervisors are degrading and intimidating employees.

Hypocrisy and Fear Dominant in the Culture:

The most harmful consequence of fear occurs when an administration's rolemodeling of ignoring integrity problems prompts the majority of supervisors to ignore them, too. When workers no longer believe there is any hope for improvement or relief from their unbearable working conditions, they can justify carrying out unethical acts that would have been unthinkable to them in the past. If people are robbed of their dignity by insecure supervisors and find themselves surrounded by the "Everyone else is doing it" mentality, misconduct is guaranteed.

Survival of the Fittest:

This ultimate level of the continuum of corruption is dominated by the pervasive intention of most employees to do whatever it takes just to survive., be it ethical or unethical.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.