As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest
ID: 1208161 • Letter: A
Question
As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest to be effective in authoritarian countries for the following reasons: 1) non-violence is capable of disrupting the pillars of support that keeps the government in power, 2) it has the potential to influence a change in ideology and 3) it reduces the chances of additional government oppression that usually stems when violence is used in protest.Give 3 examples of each 1 - 3. As certain case studies seem to suggest, it is possible for non-violent protest to be effective in authoritarian countries for the following reasons: 1) non-violence is capable of disrupting the pillars of support that keeps the government in power, 2) it has the potential to influence a change in ideology and 3) it reduces the chances of additional government oppression that usually stems when violence is used in protest.
Give 3 examples of each 1 - 3.
Give 3 examples of each 1 - 3.
Explanation / Answer
Martin Luther King fought for the rights of African American by non violence and changed the ideology of white Americans as well as of American government. Mahatma Gandhi, the father of nation of India fought by non violence with britishers and got freedom from British empire. Nelson Mandela fought by non violence with South African authority for the rights of black African community in South Africa.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.