Due Jan 28 by 11:55pmPoints File Types doc, docx, and pdf 50 Submitting a text e

Question

Due Jan 28 by 11:55pmPoints File Types doc, docx, and pdf 50 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload Read the Case of Moseley v. Pepco Energy Service, Inc. on page 100 of your textbook. (Case Analysis 5.3) Answer the Legal Reasoning Questions at the end of the case, using the information presented in chapter 5. Your submission answers must be in paragraph form, double spaced, with a minimum of 2 pages total. No cover pages. wide margins.or title page please. If you use or quote any source (which you will at least use your textbook), you must use paranthetical citations with a work-cited page at the end for reference. A work-cited page is not included in the page total. I have retyped the questions from the book below for your reference: 1. Using Duty-based ethical principles, what facts or circumstances in this case would lead Moseley to disclose Herzog's behavior? 2. Using Outcome-based ethical principles, what issues would Moseley have to analyze in making the decision to report Herzog's behavior? What would be the risks to Moseley? The benefits? 3. Using the Business Process PragmatismTM steps, what alternatives might Moseley have had in this situation?

Explanation / Answer

Business Ethical Conduct:

Ethics used in the performance of buisness activies that focuses on what is right,just and fair based on decision made daily in the workplace.

Businesses are not people. A business has a direct responsibility to its shareholders first and foremost. There is a distinction between personal ethics and business appropriate behaviour. A person in the position to make decisions that affect the company's buttom line will make a decision that is appreciate for the business within the culture of that business.

The decision may not be entirely ethical, but it will be appreciate for that business. When personal and business ethics overlap, it is a happy coincidence that the business goals are in line with decision-makers ehthcs. The moral minimum is the lowest level of socially expected behaviour incompliance with the the law.

Corporate social responsibility pairs duty-based concept with outcome-based concept in an effort to create a good citizenship business model that has a commitment to making ethical decisions, improving society, and minimizing environment impact.

Duty-based Ethics

Duty-based ethics are derived from philosophical reasoning. Any act that is unethical regardless of the circumtances is in violation of duty-based ethics. Until law that is unethical is repealed oor deemed to be invalid, it carries the weight of justicr for panaltied because it is a valid law regardless of its negative affect on society.

For example- there is a law on the books that allows girls from the age of thirteen to legally marry in pennsylvania. This may seem to be an auethical law because people in the U.S. do not reach the age of majority until they are eithteen year old. Minors do not have the legally capacity to make the decision to marryuntil they are eighteen except for law in pennsylvania.

Citizens in the state of Pennsylvania are duty-based to obey that law until it is repeated through the legislative progress.

Outcome-based Ethics-

Outcome-based ethical standards relly on the greatest good for the greater numb. This type of ethics take into consi costs and benefits aand creates as a ratio from those number and decides what level of loss is justijustifiable compared with the level of success.

Code of Ethics-

A code of ethics is a firm's principles of the ethical behaviour expected of its employees set writing.

-Whistleblower

-Whistle-blower Protection laws

1). Duty-based Ethical Priciples-

Duty-based ethics are derived from philosophical reasoning. Any act that is unethical regardless of the circumtances isin violation of duty-based ethics. Until a law that is unethical is repealed or deemed to be invalid, it carries the weight of justice for penalties because it is a valid law regardless of its negative affect on society.

Moseley would disclose Herzog's behaviour under the following facts or circumstances-

1. There was a violation of company policies and rules.

2. There was a violation of ethics regardless of ethics.

3. There is a violation of law.

2). OutcomOutcome-based Ethical Priciples-

Outcome-based ethical standards rely on the greatest good for the greater number. This type of ethics takes into consideration costs and benefits and creates a ratio from those number and decides what level of loss is justifiable compared with the level of success.

Moseley would analyse whether the costs and benefits create a justification for loss compared with the level of success when making the decision to report Herzog's behaviour.

3). Business Process Pragmatism Steps-

Step 1- Inquiry

Step 2- Discussion

Step 3- Decision

Step 4- Justification

Step 5- Evaluation

Under the business Pragmatism Steps, Moseley might have had the following alternatives-

•Through Step 1, he would have gained insight from making lists regarding relevant legal and ethical principles to guide his decision-making.

•Through Step 2, he would have been able to determine alternate action within the relevant legal the ethical principles, and his goals for proceeding with action.

•Through Step 3, he would have had a consensus decision or plan of action for the corporation.

•Through Step 4, he would have had reasonable justification for his proposed actions.

•Through Step 5, he would have been able to re-evaluate the solution to ensure its effectiveness in the situation.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.