1. How might the \"Merchants of Doubt\" be seen as a political economic determin
ID: 1129082 • Letter: 1
Question
1. How might the "Merchants of Doubt" be seen as a political economic determinant of health? How might Revlon fit into this analysis?
2. How might AIDS be seen as a political economy issues as opposed to a behaviour or biomedical issues?
3. Compare the 21st century Gates' Grand Challenges approach to developing countries health with that of the turn the 19th century interventions of the Rockefeller/Carnegie approach in the United States.
4. Explain how the Union of Concerned Scientists analyze chronic disease in the US as a political economy problem. How would their cost-benefit approach to agricultural policy save $11 trillion?
5. Consider the political economy, economics, behavioural and biomedical factors that contributed to the epidemiological transition of wealthy industrialized nations and compare and contrast with the circumstances in contemporary Africa. Included the debt/capital flight numbers provided by Ndikumana and Boyce in your answer.
Explanation / Answer
1.Ways in which Merchants of doubt can be viewed as political economic determinant of health
- Policy makers: The merchants of doubt can be viewed as political economic determinant of health because they come with policies that change the way various people see many issues of health.
-Political power: Some of the scientists have a high political position hence this makes them to support implementation of action of coming up with products that are of high economic value for their own benefits.
Ways in which Revlon may fit into this analysis
-Mentality stress: It might fit into this analysis by resulting to stress of how people view different things about smoking tobacco therefore this results health problems.
- Production of dangerous products: Production of products that affects the health of people leading to respiratory diseases.
2.Ways in which AIDS might be seen as political economy issue
-The allocation of resources: The economic issue can be clearly viewed as failure of lack of allocation of various resources to help in dealing with the virus.
-Implementation of costly projects: Political view tends not to support implementation of costly projects that tends to support research of coming up with the cure of the illness.
-Provision of funds: This results due to lack of provision of enough capital that help to foster improvement of equipment that help to find the solution to this prolonged problem.
-Awareness: Most governments do not support ways of making the diseases to be known to the public.
3.Comparison of Gates Grand Challenge approach and intervention of Rockefeller approach
-The Gates Grand challenge approach focuses more on creativity that brings in a way that is effectively and efficiently while the intervention of Rockefeller approach looks at the intervention that are made to bring good results which can be measured .
-The intervention of Rockefeller approach enhances the objectives to be achieved within a specific period of time whereas the Gates Grand Challenge ensures development of health in young women.
-The approach which is in partnership with Canada deals with the major causes of discrimination of mothers, on the other hand .Rockefeller approach in United States has distinct stages that help in operation of various activities.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.