Without government intervention such as price floor, price ceiling, and tariffs,

Question

Without government intervention such as price floor, price ceiling, and tariffs, the consumer and producer surpluses are maximized.

For example, some city governments have imposed a price ceiling on lease as part of rent control. This has caused many landlords reluctant to offer their apartments for lease and many others have stopped the development of housing units. Consequently, there has been a great shortage of apartment units in those cities. This is one of the examples of negative effects of price ceiling rather than letting the market equilibrium price to take place.

Despite this loss from the society's point of view, what are some reasons why governments intervene in the market?

Explanation / Answer

The fundamental explanations behind policy interventions by the legislature are:

1.            To correct market failures

2.            To accomplish a more fair dissemination of wage and wealth

3.            To enhance the performance of the economy

The administration could intercede both to endeavour to influence the harmony amount or to attempt to influence the balance cost. At the point when the administration trusts the cost in the market is too high, and executes a price ceiling. Rather than the harmony value, Government command that there ought to be a top, on the value that wins in the market. The case of this including rent control, in a noteworthy city, specifically New York City. Be that as it may, at that point, there are cases where these price ceilings happen. Organ gifts, social insurance, advanced education, particularly public higher education.

The reason for lease control is to make rental units less expensive for inhabitants than they would somehow or another be. Dissimilar to farming value controls, lease control in the United States has been to a great extent a neighbourhood marvel, in spite of the fact that there were national lease controls basically amid World War II. At present, around 200 urban areas and districts have some sort of lease control arrangements, and around 10% of rental units in the United States are currently subject to value controls. New York City's lease control program, which started in 1943, is among the most seasoned in the nation. Numerous different urban areas in the United States received some type of lease control in the 1970s.

With a price ceilings, the legislature precludes a cost over the greatest. A value roof that is set beneath the harmony cost makes a lack that will hold on. The reason by and large given for lease control is to keep flats moderate for low-and middle salary inhabitants.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse W
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.