1. In the past many industrial chemical waste were dispose of according to the “
ID: 1109245 • Letter: 1
Question
1. In the past many industrial chemical waste were dispose of according to the “best practice” of the time (as defined by the laws regulations). Later it was realize that the “best practice” was not very good. Should companies be held liable for public health effects such cases? 2. In the past many industrial chemical waste were disposed of in the cheapest possible way without regard to potential public health effects. Should companies be held how liable for public affects of such cases? 3. Should the way the public (and regulators) regards emissions of toxic chemicals depend on the scale of the operation responsible for the emissions compared the old-fashioned family farm with modern factory farms? 4. Should the impact of potential regulations on the profitability of regulated businesses be a factor in deciding whether to implement the regulations? 5. Is it reasonable to say that a substance is a toxic waste of great concern when produced in large amounts, but not when produced a small amounts? Where should one draw the line between small and large? 6. Are there other ways besides the reporting requirements of the emergency planning and community right to know act to determine the extent of toxic admissions from animal raising operations? 7. The rhetoric of American political debate involves a number of very traditional themes. Among them are family values in the dependence of American’s strength and identity on the family farmer. Examine news reports for a week in see how often these things (the count will be greater in an election year) Did you know there’s another rhetorical theme as well!? 1. In the past many industrial chemical waste were dispose of according to the “best practice” of the time (as defined by the laws regulations). Later it was realize that the “best practice” was not very good. Should companies be held liable for public health effects such cases? 2. In the past many industrial chemical waste were disposed of in the cheapest possible way without regard to potential public health effects. Should companies be held how liable for public affects of such cases? 3. Should the way the public (and regulators) regards emissions of toxic chemicals depend on the scale of the operation responsible for the emissions compared the old-fashioned family farm with modern factory farms? 4. Should the impact of potential regulations on the profitability of regulated businesses be a factor in deciding whether to implement the regulations? 5. Is it reasonable to say that a substance is a toxic waste of great concern when produced in large amounts, but not when produced a small amounts? Where should one draw the line between small and large? 6. Are there other ways besides the reporting requirements of the emergency planning and community right to know act to determine the extent of toxic admissions from animal raising operations? 7. The rhetoric of American political debate involves a number of very traditional themes. Among them are family values in the dependence of American’s strength and identity on the family farmer. Examine news reports for a week in see how often these things (the count will be greater in an election year) Did you know there’s another rhetorical theme as well!? 2. In the past many industrial chemical waste were disposed of in the cheapest possible way without regard to potential public health effects. Should companies be held how liable for public affects of such cases? 3. Should the way the public (and regulators) regards emissions of toxic chemicals depend on the scale of the operation responsible for the emissions compared the old-fashioned family farm with modern factory farms? 4. Should the impact of potential regulations on the profitability of regulated businesses be a factor in deciding whether to implement the regulations? 5. Is it reasonable to say that a substance is a toxic waste of great concern when produced in large amounts, but not when produced a small amounts? Where should one draw the line between small and large? 6. Are there other ways besides the reporting requirements of the emergency planning and community right to know act to determine the extent of toxic admissions from animal raising operations? 7. The rhetoric of American political debate involves a number of very traditional themes. Among them are family values in the dependence of American’s strength and identity on the family farmer. Examine news reports for a week in see how often these things (the count will be greater in an election year) Did you know there’s another rhetorical theme as well!?Explanation / Answer
1-Best practice is the practice or procedure which are superior or good and are effective for commercial purpose a,they are generally accepted and gives good results.Industrial waste is the material which cannot be used after manufactring process is completed and as per best practice it was supposed to be dumped according to the rules,regulations and policies made for different type of waste material like toxic pollutants etc.Best practices were imposed on such wastes which has given good results as well but sometimes best practice” was not very good because industrial waste was not properly disposed and it has created unsanitary conditions which lead to pollution of the environment causing many diseases spread by insects like Dengue etc.
No companies cannot be made liable for public health effects such cases as the companies were following best practices made by goverment or any other govening body rather than a company itself but if the best practices are made by company itself than it might be made liable for such health issues.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.