I need a an answer to my teachers question on my discussion post My discussion p

Question

I need a an answer to my teachers question on my discussion post

My discussion post was

There are various regulations government provide to protect investors, consumers and markets from the financial abuse. There are many reforms which are suggested by treasury department:

1. Promoting supervision and regulation of the financial organizations: There should be no financial firm that is unregulated. All the firms which have financial impact should be regulated.

New financial services oversight council of regulators to determine the risk associated with the system

There should be a authority to supervise all firm that might have significant impact on financial stability in the country

New National Bank supervisor

2. Comprehensive supervision of financial market:

More advanced regulation of securities markets

Regulation of over the counter derivatives

3. Protection of consumers and investors

New consumer financial protection Agency

Improving transparency, risk management process, appropriateness and fairness

4. Equipping government with the tools to manage financial crisis

New program to save the issues pertaining to non-banking financial institution

Revision of the lending authority to have better risk management system

5. Raising international regulatory standards and collaboration

The problem now has become global and to protect the investors we need to act globally. Which is why this is a key point to be taken into account when dealing with the issues.

WC: 214

References:

Cross, F., & Miller, R., (2018), The Legal Environment of Business, Tenth Edition,Cengage Learning

My teachers question

What is really the purpose of these laws?

Explanation / Answer

Government direction influences the financial industry from multiple points of view; however the particular effect relies upon the idea of the control. Expanded direction normally implies a higher workload for individuals in budgetary administrations, since it requires significant investment and push to adjust business practices to guarantee that the new controls are being taken after effectively.

While the expanded time and workload coming about because of government control can be unfavorable to individual budgetary or credit administrations organizations for the time being, government directions can likewise profit the money related administrations industry all in all in the long haul. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed by Congress in 2002 because of different budgetary outrages including extensive combinations, for example, Enron and WorldCom. The demonstration considered senior administration of organizations responsible for the exactness of their money related proclamations, while additionally requiring that inner controls be set up at these organizations to counteract future extortion and manhandle. Executing these directions was costly, yet the demonstration gave more security to individuals putting resources into budgetary administrations, which can build financial specialist certainty and enhance general corporate venture.

The Securities And Exchange Commission (SEC) manages the securities advertises and should ensure speculators against blunder and misrepresentation. Preferably, these sorts of directions likewise energize greater venture, and help ensure the steadiness of money related administrations organizations. This does not generally work, as the money related emergency of 2007 illustrated. The SEC had loose the net capital prerequisite for real venture banks, enabling them to convey essentially more obligation than what they had in value. At the point when the lodging bubble imploded, the abundance obligation ended up noticeably lethal and banks began to fizzle.

Different sorts of direction don't profit money related administrations or resource administration by any stretch of the imagination, however are expected to ensure different premiums outside of the corporate world. Natural controls are a typical case of this. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regularly requires an organization or industry to redesign gear and to utilize more costly procedures to decrease natural effect. These sorts of directions frequently have a progressively outstretching influence, causing tumult in the share trading system and general insecurity in the money related segment as the controls produce results. Organizations regularly attempt to move their expanded expenses to their shoppers or clients, which is another motivation behind why natural controls are frequently questionable.

Government control has likewise been utilized as a part of the past to spare organizations that would some way or another not survive. The Troubled Asset Relief Program was controlled by the United States Treasury and gave it the specialist to infuse billions of dollars into the U.S. money related framework to balance out it in the wake of the 2007 and 2008 budgetary emergency. This sort of government intercession is normally disapproved of in the U.S., however the outrageous idea of the emergency required speedy and solid activity to keep entire money related fall.

The administration assumes the part of arbitrator between business firms and shoppers. An excessive amount of direction can smother development and drive up costs, while too little can prompt blunder, defilement and fall. This makes it hard to decide the correct effect that an administration direction will have in the budgetary administrations part, yet that effect is regularly extensive and dependable.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.