Freemont insurance sells homeowners insurance. In a recent financial review, man
ID: 1092485 • Letter: F
Question
Freemont insurance sells homeowners insurance. In a recent financial review, managers discovered that company performance was lagging behind projections. They examined pricing and claims history in more detail and identified a group of about 20,000 homeowners insurance customers whose claims far exceeded the collected premiums. Members of the actuarial group, whose compensation was partially tied to profitability of the policies they priced, were particularly frustrated. a. Who is making the bad decision? b. Does this group have enough information to make a good decision? c. Does this group have an incentive to make a good decision? d. Suppose moral hazard is at play. What is one thing that Freemont could do to reduce the problem of moral hazard? e. Suppose adverse selection is at play. What is one thing that Freemont could do to reduce the problem of adverse selection? The company hired a consultant to do a deep dive into the 20,000 customers whose claims far exceed the collected costs. The consultants noted that a significant number of these customers were far more likely to have had prior claims with their prior insurer. They took this information to the actuaries, but the actuaries said they were already taking into account the number of prior claims into their pricing. f. How can we reconcile the fact that the actuaries were taking into account the number or prior claims into the pricing, but still underpricing these policies?
Explanation / Answer
Freemont insurance sells homeowners insurance. In a recent financial review, managers discovered that company performance was lagging behind projections. They examined pricing and claims history in more detail and identified a group of about 20,000 homeowners insurance customers whose claims far exceeded the collected premiums. Members of the actuarial group, whose compensation was partially tied to profitability of the policies they priced, were particularly frustrated
a. Who is making the bad decision?
Ans:The actuarial group is to be blamed for making the bad decision.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Does this group have enough information to make a good decision?
Ans: Yes, the group has enough information to make a good decision.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Does this group have an incentive to make a good decision?
Ans: Yes, their compensation is linked to profitability. If the company makes more revenue, the group is paid more.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Suppose moral hazard is at play. What is one thing that Freemont could do to reduce the problem of moral hazard?
Ans: Freemont could raise premiums with every accident.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Suppose adverse selection is at play. What is one thing that Freemont could do to reduce the problem of adverse selection? The company hired a consultant to do a deep dive into the 20,000 customers whose claims far exceed the collected costs. The consultants noted that a significant number of these customers were far more likely to have had prior claims with their prior insurer. They took this information to the actuaries, but the actuaries said they were already taking into account the number of prior claims into their pricing.
Ans: Freemont needs to screen people better. Lets take the example of a background check. If Freemont starts to do a background check in reference to the insurance policy previously owned by customers, they can find out their history.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
f. How can we reconcile the fact that the actuaries were taking into account the number or prior claims into the pricing, but still underpricing these policies?
Ans: There are two possible answers to this question : Scenaria I : This is random and there is nothing in their background that could have predicted this. This number is reasonable (20000 customers whose claims far exceed the collected costs) assuming that they have large customer database. Scenario II : The were not weighing the past accidents. They should have charged a higher premium relative to the number of past accidents.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.