ANCIENT SLAVERY: DEATHSENTENCE ORuFE oppORTUNITY? in the ancient world, slavery
ID: 106832 • Letter: A
Question
ANCIENT SLAVERY: DEATHSENTENCE ORuFE oppORTUNITY? in the ancient world, slavery wasanormal part of many societies, including the cultures of the Ancient world. Slavery did exist very early in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and other areas of the East. The systems of slavery in Greece and Rome are our focus here, however, partly because they have well studied and partly because they pose fascinating contradictions about the concepts of free been so in settings that slaves and non-free conditions of human beings. It seems quite clear all these constituted at least half of the population of any ancient city because even relatively poor people owned one or two slaves. In many instances, slaves made up a majority of the residents, especially on vast agricultural estates and in great urban households In Greece, the freedom of the citizens of a state depended on the enslavement of others in the case of Sparta, the Spartans defeated neighbors, the Messenians became slaves of the state, known as "helots" who could not hope for individual emancipation. The agricultural labor of the helots freed the Spartans to make war on other states. In the case of Athens, the "democratic" constitution of Athens was based on the fact that citizens could participate in discussions and assemblies and jury trials because the work of the home, the farm, and the shop was being done by slaves. In Rome, the situation was both worse and better. It was worse because the Romans made war on virtually every other nation and enslaved the survivorsof the battles. It was better because the Romans allowed their slaves the possibility of gaining iberty through a relatively common practice of manumission. A freed slave would then owe duties to his former master, part of his income, and loyalty in both life and death, but his children could aspire to full participation in the government at any level, particularly as the Roman Empire became increasingly more cosmopolitan. In both societies, the opportunity for freedom and the daily quality of life were affected by the place of work and the nature of labor. In either society, being a slave in the mines was virtually a death sentence If a slave worked on a farm, the chances of receiving tips with which he might eventually purchase his liberty were nearly non-existent, and one seldom reads of an agricultural slave gaining freedom or fortune.Aslave who resided in an urban household, however, had many chances to infiuence his or her owner to consider offering liberty as the ultimate reward for loyal service. Since many city-dwelling slaves had special skills as craftsmen or teachers or doctors, and since they frequently worked alongside their owners in Greece or were set up in shops in Rome, they were more readily considered worthy of freedom. Whereas slaves in a mine or on a farm might be seen as 'talking tools," the slaves in a household or a workshop could be appreciated as human beings whom fate had assigned an undeserved The source of slaves varied through time and through the caprice of human action. An enormous quantity of slaves were "saved from death in warfare and sold in the slave markets to increase the Adapted from Linda Jones Hall slaven: Death Sentence or Life opportunity? in Exploring the Western Past (Cengage Learning Solutions, 2008).Explanation / Answer
Answer:1
The conditions of slaves were differ for different regions as in Greece, the freedom of citizen were depend upon the number of slaves, means slaves were restricted to do by their own decision. Whereas in Rome, the slaves were suffered from both good as well as worst condition, good condition because slaves were allowed to do common practise of manumission and worst condition were due to war on every other nation.
Answer:2
The trend of slavery were changed through time as slaves were sentenced to death and did not allow to do anything by their wish but gradually these boundations were vanished and slaves were become more free and liable to work with some freedom and liberty.
Answer:3
The authors gave various examples to demonstrate the conditions of slavery through time with some particular regions and countries such as Greece and Rome. The slaves were restricted to show their feelings and were not able to do according to their desire, through time slaves were become free and unbound.
Answer:4
The authors had sympathy with the slaves but not try to end this because influence by the other authors, as only few of them were have sympathy while other had same feelings of taking work according to their desire.
Answer:5
Roman slavery were very much different from others as romans were not so strict towards their slaves, they are good atleast because they gave some liberty and freedom to their slaves. Whereas other societies were not given any relaxation to their slaves, they only wanted work from them of their means.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.